Open grassland at the edge of the development map

Selected work · Case 001

Save Tunkwa Grasslands

Public land. Private ownership. Public pays. A community-response activation built where a 208 MW industrial project meets a working ranching landscape — and where the case was being decided quietly, in documents almost no one had read.

ResearchNarrativePrintAI productionCommunity

776 ha

Working grassland under assessment

208 MW

Single development, two phases

25–40 yr

Footprint on public Crown land

4,000 pg

Assessment file, distilled to one page

The brief

An industrial solar development was advancing through environmental assessment on roughly 776 hectares of Crown grassland — land actively used for grazing, hunting, riding, and recreation, and recovering from a recent wildfire. Presented as a clean-energy win, the proposal would fence and convert working public land for a generation.

The challenge was never to be against renewables. It was to make a slow, document-buried decision legible — and to do it before the window for public input quietly closed.

How we made it impossible to overlook.

01

The quiet audit

We read the full Initial Project Description line by line and mapped what the brochure language left out — where the panels actually land, which trails they sit on top of, and which water sources go unclassified. Facts first, framing second.

02

One page, every doorstep

A planning file built to run to thousands of pages became a single illustrated broadsheet. Plain numbers, real sightlines, and a clear deadline — delivered door-to-door before the consultation window closed.

03

A neutral place to stand

An independent, non-partisan campaign site that names what it is not: not government, not a utility, not corporate-funded. A research assistant lets anyone interrogate the same documents the proponents rely on.

The assessment file, distilled to a single illustrated broadsheet
4,000 pages → one broadsheet
Industrial infrastructure at the edge of working land
What the brochure left out

What changed

  • Cumulative-effects map showing multiple projects converging on one landscape — the part no single review process accounts for.

  • Reframed the story from "green project" to land-use, jobs, and value per hectare — pro-responsible development, not anti-development.

  • Mobilised local volunteers around flyer delivery, sign placement, and land-use documentation before approvals could advance.

Your situation won't fit a case study. That's exactly why it's worth a conversation.

Get in touch